Commonwealth v. Rowe

Commonwealth v. Ronald J. Rowe

Commonwealth v. Rowe, 465 N.E.2d 1220 (Mass. App. Ct. 1984)

Court: Massachusetts Appeals Court · State Appellate Courts
Decided: July 9, 1984
Citations: 465 N.E.2d 122018 Mass. App. Ct. 9261984 Mass. App. LEXIS 1531

Cited by 10 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

On an indictment for statutory rape (G. L. c. 265, § 23) of a fifteen year old child, the defendant was convicted by the jury of indecent assault and battery of a person fourteen years of age or older (G. L. c. 265, § 13H, inserted by St. 1980, c. 459, § 5). The defendant argues that the judge erred *927 in failing to instruct the jury that lack of consent by the victim was an element of the latter offense. (The trial was had before the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court in Commonwealth v. Burke, 390 Mass. 480 , 484 n.4 [1983], which so held.)

John C. Gates for the defendant. Charles K. Stephenson, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

The problem with the conviction is more far reaching. Lack of consent is not an element of statutory rape, and it follows that indecent assault and battery is not an offense included within the indictment. See Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 379, 380-382 (1981), and cases cited. We must consider the point on our own motion, because the scope of the indictment goes to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. Commonwealth v. Burns, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 194, 196 (1979). It is immaterial that the defendant, by requesting the lesser-included-offense instruction, “invited” the error (see Lannon v. Commonwealth, 379 Mass. 786, 792-793 [1980]), because the parties may not by consent, conduct, or waiver confer jurisdiction on the court. Second Bank-State Street Trust Co. v. Linsley, 341 Mass. 113, 116 (1960). Tosti v. Ayik, 386 Mass. 721, 725 (1982). However, the fact that the court had no jurisdiction under the present indictment to convict and sentence the defendant for indecent assault and battery means that the defendant was not put in jeopardy with respect to that offense and thus may now be tried for thát offense on a new indictment so charging. Commonwealth v. Roby, 12 Pick. 496 , 501 (1832). Commonwealth v. Gosselin, 365 Mass. 116, 122 (1974). Commonwealth v. Burns, supra at 198 n.2.

Judgment reversed.

Verdict set aside.

Judgment for the defendant.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(noting that, after Burke, lack of consent is clearly an element of a conviction under § 13H)

Sutherland v. Reno, 228 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2000)
(where indictment charged statutory rape, Superior Court lacked jurisdiction to convict defendant of indecent assault and battery)

Fitzpatrick v. Commonwealth, 453 Mass. 1014 (2009)

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Commonwealth v. Reid497 N.E.2d 1107 (Mass. App. Ct. 1986)
Felix Sutherland v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States228 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2000)
Maghsoudi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service181 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 1999)
United States v. Lepore304 F. Supp. 2d 183 (D. Mass. 2004)
United States v. Cadieux350 F. Supp. 2d 275 (D. Me. 2004)
Commonwealth v. Egerton487 N.E.2d 481 (Mass. 1986)

Most recent

Commonwealth v. Roderiques940 N.E.2d 1234 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)
Fitzpatrick v. Commonwealth453 Mass. 1014 (2009)
United States v. Cadieux350 F. Supp. 2d 275 (D. Me. 2004)
United States v. Lepore304 F. Supp. 2d 183 (D. Mass. 2004)
Felix Sutherland v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States228 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2000)
Maghsoudi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service181 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Commonwealth v. Burns, 392 N.E.2d 865 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)	33
	Commonwealth v. Burke, 457 N.E.2d 622 (Mass. 1983)	104
	Lannon v. Commonwealth, 400 N.E.2d 862 (Mass. 1980)	53
	Tosti v. Ayik, 437 N.E.2d 1062 (Mass. 1982)	40
	Commonwealth v. Gosselin, 309 N.E.2d 884 (Mass. 1974)	39
	Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 416 N.E.2d 540 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)	17
	Second Bank-State St. Trust Co. v. Linsley, 167 N.E.2d 624 (Mass. 1960)	9

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list