TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Parish v. United States

John L. Parish v. United States of America United States Attorney General United States Attorney Mike West David Spangler Gerald Schafer Jim Younger Jane Doe James B. Wolfe, Jr. First Union Corporation, D/B/A First Union National Bank of North Carolina

Parish v. United States, 12 F.3d 205 (1st Cir. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 17, 1993
Docket
No. 92-1595
Citations
12 F.3d 2051993 WL 4759651993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36809
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

12 F.3d 205

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John L. PARISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Attorney General; United States Attorney; Mike West; David Spangler; Gerald Schafer; Jim Younger; Jane Doe; James B. Wolfe, Jr.; First Union Corporation, d/b/a First Union National Bank of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-1595.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 9, 1993. Decided: November 17, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.

John L. Parish, Appellant Pro Se.

Benjamin Harvey White, Jr., United States Attorney; David Spangler, Gerald Schafer; Jim Younger; J. Thomas Dunn, Jr., Barbara J. Hellenschmidt, FIRST UNION CORPORATION LEGAL DIVISION, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION 1

John L. Parish appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Complaint filed against the United States and a number of other Defendants for conduct in connection with his bankruptcy proceedings. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parish v. United States, No. CA-91371-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list