Burles v. Roberts
BURLES v. ROBERTS McTAVISH v. SAME BELLOMINI v. SAME
Burles v. Roberts, 24 N.M. 256 (1918)
Syllabus
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
Section 15, chapter 43, Laws 1917, interpreted, and held to have the effect of abating- an appeal or writ of error where no cost bond is filed within the time required by the statute.
Summary
Appeal from District Court, McKinley County; Ray-nolds, Judge.
Separate actions by Charles Buries, by Robert H. Mc-Tavish, and by Nello Bellomini, against R. L. Roberts and others. From judgments dismissing the complaints on defendants’ motion, plaintiff in each case appeals.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION OP THE COURT. PARKER, J. The facts in these cases are identical with those in Hernandez v. Roberts et al., 24 N. M. 253, 173 Pac. 1034 , not yet officially reported, and for the reasons stated in that .case the motion fo dismiss the appeal will be granted; and it is so ordered. Hanna, C. J., and RobeRts, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.