TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Martino

State v. Martino, 176 P. 815 (N.M. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Mexico Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 2, 1918
Docket
No. 2225
Judges
Boberts, Hanna, Parker
Citations
176 P. 81525 N.M. 47
Disposition
Reversed, with directions.
Syllabus
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT. Upon the trial of one charg-ed with unlawfully and knowingly permitting a game of chance for money to be played on premises occupied by him, the record of the information charging third persons with unlawful gaming and their pleas of guilty thereto is inadmissible as hearsay and as depriving the defendant of his constitutional right to be confronted bjr the witnesses against him.
Summary
Appeal from District Court, Colfax County; Leib, Judge. Antonio Martino was convicted of knowingly permitting a game of poker to be played on the premises, and appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hanna

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

OPINION OP THE COURT. HANNA, C. J. Antonio Martino was convicted in the district court for Colfax county upon an information charging him with having committed the offense of unlawfully and knowingly permitting a game of poker, plajred for money, to be played upon premises occupied by him. From the sentence imposed upon bim be has appealed.

In order to prove that the game was played for money, the state introduced in evidence, over appellant’s objection, the judicial record of the information and pleas of guilty of the four men whom the state contended were engaged in the unlawful game of chance played upon the premises occupied by the appellant. The case of Kirby v. United States, 174 U. S. 47 , 19 Sup. Ct. 574, 43 L. Ed. 890 , contains a fine discussion of the principle of law applicable to tbe proposition raised by the appellant, and requires a reversal of tbe case at bar. By virtue of tlie authority of that ease we hold that the record of the conviction of a gambler, on his plea of guilty to an information against him for gambling for money, is not admissible to prove the gaming for money on the trial of one charged with unlawfully and knowingly permitting such game to be played upon premises occupied by him.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed, with instructions to grant the appellant a new trial; and it is so ordered. Parker and Boberts, J.J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1943: 11959: 11971: 11979: 11980: 12012: 12018: 119432026peak 1943 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Naranjo611 P.2d 1107 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979)
  2. State v. Jackson143 P.2d 875 (N.M. 1943)
  3. State v. Lunn484 P.2d 368 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)
  4. State v. Urioste617 P.2d 156 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980)
  5. State v. Flores430 P.3d 534 (N.M. Ct. App. 2018)
  6. State v. Tollardo2012 NMSC 008, 275 P.3d 110

Most recent

  1. State v. Flores430 P.3d 534 (N.M. Ct. App. 2018)
  2. State v. Tollardo2012 NMSC 008, 275 P.3d 110
  3. State v. Urioste617 P.2d 156 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980)
  4. State v. Naranjo611 P.2d 1107 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979)
  5. State v. Lunn484 P.2d 368 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)
  6. State v. Morello169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 213 (1959) · Concurrence

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Kirby v. United States, 174 U.S. 47 (1899) 282

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list