TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Local 890 of the International Union of Mine v. New Jersey Zinc Co.

LOCAL 890 OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF MINE, MILL AND SMELTER WORKERS, Its Officers, Agents and Members, and International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, Its Officers, Agents, and Employees, and Clinton E. Jencks, Cipriano Montoya, Ernest Velasquez, Vicente Becerra, Pablo Montoya, and Fred Barreras, in Error v. The NEW JERSEY ZINC COMPANY, a corporation, in Error

Local 890 of the Int'l Union of Mine v. N.J. Zinc Co., 261 P.2d 654 (N.M. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Mexico Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 25, 1953
Docket
No. 5579
Judges
Compton, Lujan, McGhee, Sadler, Seymour
Citations
261 P.2d 65457 N.M. 627

Opinion of the Court — Seymour

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SEYMOUR, Justice. The writ of error for which application was filed in this Court on the 17th day of September, 1952 is granted.

Plaintiffs in error may supersede and stay execution of the judgment against them upon making and filing a good and sufficient bond with the Clerk of this Court, said bond to be in the amount of $5,000 if a joint and several bond, or bonds in the amount of $1,000 each if individual bonds be filed, said bond or bonds to be conditioned as provided by 1941 Comp. § 19-201(9) where recovery is for other than a fixed amount of money. It is so ordered. SADLER, C J., and McGHEE, COMPTON and LUJAN, JJ'., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1953: 11954: 119532026peak 1953 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jencks v. Goforth261 P.2d 655 (N.M. 1953)
  2. Rhodes v. State ex rel. Bliss273 P.2d 852 (N.M. 1954)

Most recent

  1. Rhodes v. State ex rel. Bliss273 P.2d 852 (N.M. 1954)
  2. Jencks v. Goforth261 P.2d 655 (N.M. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list