Koons v. Arizona Mining Co.
A. B. KOONS, and v. THE ARIZONA MINING COMPANY and THE PHŒNIX MINING COMPANY, and
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Upon the authority of Putnam v. Putnam, ante, p. 182, 24 Pac. 320 , we cannot consider the errors assigned by appellants in this case, as no bill of exceptions was preserved to the ruling of the court upon the motion for a new trial.
There is nothing but the minute entries of the clerk in this transcript showing that the motion was ever made or acted upon by the court. All the errors assigned might have been good cause for a new trial, and should have been urged in the court below in their motion, and if an adverse ruling was made, this ruling excepted to and presented to us by a proper bill of exceptions.
As no error appears upon the face of the record, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.