TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mallion Davidson v. Gary L. Aaron John Doe Tommie Taliaferro Patrick Whalen, Warden George E. Hurst James M. Ralph Bill Hedrick

Mallion Davidson v. Gary L. Aaron John Doe Tommie Taliaferro Patrick Whalen, Warden George E. Hurst James M. Ralph Bill Hedrick, 14 F.3d 594 (4th Cir. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 21, 1993
Docket
No. 93-6586
Citations
14 F.3d 5941993 WL 5279201993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37156
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

14 F.3d 594

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Mallion DAVIDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary L. AARON; John Doe; Tommie Taliaferro; Patrick Whalen, Warden; George E. Hurst; James M. Ralph; Bill Hedrick, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6586.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 28, 1993. Dec. 21, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Mallion Davidson, Appellant Pro Se.

Rebeca Olivia Hidalgo, Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

OPINION 1

Mallion Davidson appeals from a district court order dismissing his Bivens * complaint. We vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.

2

The district court found that Davidson's complaint only requested declaratory and injunctive relief. Although the request was not in the "relief" section of the complaint, the complaint explicitly requested monetary damages. Because we are constrained to view pro se pleadings liberally, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), we interpret Davidson's complaint to sufficiently seek monetary relief. Accordingly, we remand for further consideration for Davidson's complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED * Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) 26,889
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) 17,038

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list