TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Martin v. State

MARTIN and FLINN v. State

Martin v. State, 29 Ala. 30 (1856)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1856
Judges
Walker
Citations
29 Ala. 30
Headnotes
[INDICTMENT EC® ARSON.] 1. Sufficiency of indictment. — An indictment for the willful burning- of a house insured against fire, with intent to charge or injure the insurer, (Code, § 3137,) is fatally defective, on motion in arrest of judgment, if it does not allege that the house was “ at the time insured against fire.”
Summary
ERROR to the City Court of Mobile. Tried before the Hon. Alex. McKinstry. This indictment was found at the April term, 1856, and contained but a single count, which charged that the defendants “willfully burned certain property, to-wit,” (describing the bar, shelves, fixtures, Ac., of a certain building in the city of Mobile, called “The Constitution,”) “which said bar, fixtures,” &c., “ were then and there the property of the said Martin, and then and there insured by the Mobile Navigation and Mutual Insurance Company, said company being then and there duly incorpprated, with full power to insure against losses by fire, with intent to charge or injure the said insurance company.” After conviction, the defendants moved in arrest of judgment, on the ground that the indictment was fatally defective, because (among other reasons) it did not allege that the property burned was “ insured against fire.” The court overruled the motion, and the defendants reserved the question for the decision of the supreme court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Walker

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WALKER, J.

The statute, upon which the appellants were indicted, is in the following words: “Any person who willfully burns a building, or any property, which is at the time insured against fire, with intent to charge or injure the insurer, must be imprisoned in the penitentiary, not less than five, nor more than ten years.” — Code, 569, § 3131. The indictment charges the defendants, in a single count, with willfully burning certain property, which was at the time insured by the Mobile Navigation and Mutual Insurance Company, said company being duly incorporated with full power to insure against losses by fire, “ with intent to charge or injure the said insurance company.” The indictment does not allege that the property burned was at the time insured against fire. The statute aims to punish the willful burning of any building, or other property, which is at the time insured against fire. It may be true, as charged in the indictment, that the property was insured, and yet it may also, be true that it was not insured against fire. Every thing in the indictment may be true, and nevertheless the offense condemned by the statute may not have been committed, for the fact that the insurance was against fire is indispensable to constitute the offense. The indictment is therefore defective, and the motion in arrest of judgment ought to have been sustained. — 22 Ala. 54 ; 21 Ala. 53 ; 12 Ala. 132 ; 13 Ala. 413 ; 2 Ala, 96; 15 Ala. 259 ; 9 P. 260 ; 7 P. 405 .

*32 The judgment of the court below is reversed., and the cause remanded ; but the prisoners must remain in custody, until discharged by due course of law.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1886–1887: 118862026peak 1886 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Heard v. State81 Ala. 55 (1886)

Most recent

  1. Heard v. State81 Ala. 55 (1886)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Bullock, 13 Ala. 413 (1848) 25
Williams v. State, 15 Ala. 259 (1849) 11
Smith v. State, 22 Ala. 54 (1853) 9
Carter v. Mundy, 12 Ala. 132 (1847) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list