TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stearns v. State

Stearns v. State, 58 So. 124 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 6, 1912
Judges
Graffenried
Citations
58 So. 1244 Ala. App. 1541912 Ala. App. LEXIS 272
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Violating Prohibition Law. 1. Indictment and Information; Offenses Included; Oowoiction.— Under Section 33, Acts 1909, p. 94, where a person was indicted for unlawfully selling liquor, he may be convicted of acting in the sale as an assisting ■ friend. 2. Trial; Findings; Province of Jury. — Although the facts in a cause are undisputed, yet if they are such that reasonable men may conscientiously arrive at different conclusions therefrom, the determination of their effect is for the jury.
Summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson. Ben Stearne.was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. No brief reached the Reporter. The defendant was properly convicted under the evidence on the indictment. — Winter v. The State, 132 Ala. 32; Bond v. The State, 130 Ala. 117; Darrington v. The State, 162 Ala. 60; Rayfield v. The State, 167 Ala. 94; Section 33, Acts 1909, p. 94.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Graffenried

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

db GRAFFENRIED, J.

It has been frequently held that when the facts, although undisputed, are such that reasonable men may reasonably and conscientiously arrive at opposite conclusions from them, such facts present, not a question of law for the court, but a question of fact for the determination of the jury. —Luke v. Calhoun County, 52 Ala. 115 ; Cole v. Propst, 119 Ala. 99 , 24 South. 884 ; Abbott v. Mobile, 119 Ala. 595 , 24 South. 565 .

The evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the defendant, shows that he was the assisting friend of either the buyer or the seller of the liquor, and the assisting friend in such a transaction may now be convicted upon evidence showing that he was merely such assisting friend, upon an indictment charging him with an unlawful sale of liquor.—General and Local Acts Special Session 1909, p. 94, § 33; Andrew Boyd v. State, 3 Ala. App. 178 , 57 South. 1019 . The court, therefore, properly refused to give to the jury the general affirmative charge requested in writing by the defendant.— Medley v. State, 156 Ala. 78 , 47 South. 218 ; Griffin v. State, 150 Ala. 49 , 43 South. 197 ; McCormack Co. v. Lowe, 151 Ala. 313 , 44 South. 47 .

The judgment of the court beloiv is affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1944: 11946: 21981: 12009: 119442026peak 1946 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pate v. State26 So. 2d 214 (Ala. Ct. App. 1946)
  2. Thompson v. State27 So. 2d 55 (Ala. Ct. App. 1946)
  3. Hale v. KROGER LTD. PARTNERSHIP I28 So. 3d 772 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009)
  4. Taylor v. State20 So. 2d 239 (Ala. Ct. App. 1944)
  5. Cooper v. State393 So. 2d 495 (Ala. Crim. App. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Hale v. KROGER LTD. PARTNERSHIP I28 So. 3d 772 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009)
  2. Cooper v. State393 So. 2d 495 (Ala. Crim. App. 1981)
  3. Pate v. State26 So. 2d 214 (Ala. Ct. App. 1946)
  4. Thompson v. State27 So. 2d 55 (Ala. Ct. App. 1946)
  5. Taylor v. State20 So. 2d 239 (Ala. Ct. App. 1944)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Griffin v. State, 43 So. 197 (Ala. 1907) 26
McCormack Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Lowe, 44 So. 47 (Ala. 1907) 25
Medley v. State, 47 So. 218 (Ala. 1908) 15
Boyd v. State, 57 So. 1019 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912) 12
Luke v. Calhoun Cnty., 52 Ala. 115 (1875) 35
Cole v. Propst Bros., 119 Ala. 99 (1898) 5
Abbott v. City of Mobile, 119 Ala. 595 (1898) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list