Southern Railway Co. v. Graham
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PELHAM, J.
The appeal in this case is prosecuted from a judgment of the circuit court of Clarke county quashing, on motion of appellee, (plaintiff in the trial court), the writ of certiorari by which the case was brought to that court from the court of a justice of the peace, and dismissing the proceeding in the circuit court. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor does it show that an exception was reserved to the action of the court in granting the motion. To be reviewable here, the motion and the ruling thereon must be shown by bill of exceptions, and not being thus Shown, an affirmation necessarily follows. —City of Jasper v. Barton, 1 Ala. App. 472 , 56 South. 42 ; Hooper v. State, 141 Ala. 111 , 37 South. 662 ; Wilson v. State, 136 Ala. 114 , 33 South. 831 ; Randall v. Wadsworth, 130 Ala. 633 , 31 South. 555 ; Cottingham v. Greely, 129 Ala. 200 , 30 South. 560 , 87 Am. St. Rep. 58 ; Holley v. Coffee, 123 Ala. 406 , 26 South. 239 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.