TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Russellville, Town of v. White

Russellville, Town of v. White, 41 Ark. 485 (1883)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 15, 1883
Judges
English
Citations
41 Ark. 485
Headnotes
Hotel : Power of municipal corporation to license. The power to regulate hotels given to municipal corporation by act of March 9,1S75, includes the power to license as a means of regulating.
Summary
APPEAL from Pope circuit court. Hon. W. D. Jacoway, Circuit Judge. The power to regulate includes the power to license.Sec. 17, Acts 1874-5, p. 9 and 10; AUerton v. Chicago, Am. Law Reg., Vol. 20, AT. 8., p. 473; Cincinnati v. Bryson, 15 Ohio, 625, and cases cited. The power to “regulate” does not include the power to “license, tax, etc.,” as used in other portions of the act. The legislature expressly gave cities power “to regulate, tax, license or suppress” other occupations, but only to “regulate” hotels. These words have a well defined meaning in law. — 1 Dillon on Mu. Corp., sec. 357 to 361 (3d. JEd.) ; Martin ex parte, 27 Arle., 467; 33 Arle., 436.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — English

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

' English, C. J. EL F. White was charged before the mayor of Russellville with keeping a hotel or place of public ■entertainment within the limits of the town without obtaining license as required by an ordinance of the town council.

He admitted that he kept a hotel without license as alleged, but denied the power of the town to pass the ordinance 1‘equiring hotel keepers to obtain license. The mayor fined him $10, and he appealed to the circuit court, where a demurrer was sustained to the charge, and he was discharged and the town appealed.

The seventeenth section of the act of March 9, 1875, gives to municipal corporations organized under the act, power to regulate hotels and other houses for public entertainment.

It has been decided that the power to regulate includes the power to license as a means of regulating. Allerton v. Chicago, 20 Am. Law Register, 473 and notes; Chicago Packing and Provision Co. v. City of Chicago, 88 Ill., 221 , and cases cited.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to the court below to overrule the demurrer to the charge, and for further proceedings, etc.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1886–1887: 11900–1901: 11904–1905: 11908–1909: 11942–1943: 118862026peak 1886 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Schneider69 L.R.A. 345 (Mich. 1905)
  2. Helena v. Miller114 S.W. 237 (Ark. 1908)
  3. Brewster v. Pine Bluff65 S.W. 934 (Ark. 1901)
  4. Talley v. City of Blytheville164 S.W.2d 900 (Ark. 1942)
  5. Smith v. Dodson1 Ga. L. Rep. 602 (1886)

Most recent

  1. Talley v. City of Blytheville164 S.W.2d 900 (Ark. 1942)
  2. Helena v. Miller114 S.W. 237 (Ark. 1908)
  3. People v. Schneider69 L.R.A. 345 (Mich. 1905)
  4. Brewster v. Pine Bluff65 S.W. 934 (Ark. 1901)
  5. Smith v. Dodson1 Ga. L. Rep. 602 (1886)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Chicago Packing & Provision Co. v. City of Chicago, 88 Ill. 221 (1878) 40

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list