TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Accelerated Civil Case List

IN RE: ACCELERATED CIVIL CASE LIST

In re Accelerated Civil Case List, 700 S.W.2d 62 (Ark. Ct. App. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 27, 1985
Citations
700 S.W.2d 6216 Ark. App. 3011985 Ark. App. LEXIS 2214

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam. In a per curiam opinion handed down July 5, 1984, see 12 Ark. App. 415 , we pointed out that criminal cases and certain civil cases are given preference by law as to the order in which they are submitted to the Arkansas Court of Appeals. In that opinion, we set out a procedure whereby the “other” civil cases could be placed on an accelerated civil list. Under Act 770 of 1985, criminal cases, child custody cases, appeals under the Workers’ Compensation Law and the Employment Security Law, and appeals from the Public Service Commission are now given preference over all “other” civil cases. Experience has convinced us that we should now modify the procedure adopted by our per curiam of July 5, 1984.

Therefore, effective today, if an attorney files a motion in this court asking that a civil case, which is not now entitled to preferential submission, be placed on an accelerated civil list and states the reason for the request, the court may grant that request if all the briefs have been filed in the case.

A copy of any such motion shall be given to opposing counsel and a certificate to that effect endorsed on the request.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1988: 119882026peak 1988 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Hooks749 S.W.2d 291 (Ark. 1988) · Concurrence

Most recent

  1. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Hooks749 S.W.2d 291 (Ark. 1988) · Concurrence

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list