TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Upshur v. West Farm Home Owners Ass'n, Inc.

Ronald C. Upshur v. West Farm Home Owners Association, Incorporated Chambers Enterprises, Incorporated Roger Real Estate Darlene Brown Lonnie Harrison Sam Ibrahim, and U.S. Home Corporation

Upshur v. West Farm Home Owners Ass'n, 21 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 4, 1994
Docket
No. 94-1069
Citations
21 F.3d 4261994 WL 112761

Opinion

21 F.3d 426 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ronald C. UPSHUR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WEST FARM HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED; Chambers Enterprises, Incorporated; Roger Real Estate; Darlene Brown; Lonnie Harrison; Sam Ibrahim, Defendants Appellees, and U.S. HOME CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. 94-1069.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994. Decided April 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-1852-DKC)

Ronald C. Upshur, appellant pro se.

Richard E. Schimel, Budow & Noble, P.C., Bethesda, MD; David Lee Bortz, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from a district court order denying his request that the district judge recuse himself, and denying his request for reconsideration of the court's earlier decision denying his motion for appointment of another attorney. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 8,958

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list