TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Solio

State v. John Solio

State v. Solio, 54 A. 684 (1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of General Session of the Peace · State Trial Courts
Decided
November 21, 1902
Docket
No. 34
Judges
Lore
Citations
54 A. 68420 Del. 1384 Penne. 1381902 Del. LEXIS 50
Headnotes
Criminal Law—Selling Intoxicating Liquors—Indictment; Sufficiency of—Pleading. It is not sufficient in an indictment for selling intoxicating liquors to allege that the defendant did ‘ ‘ unlawfully sell intoxicating liquors, to wit, unlawfully to one,” etc. The indictment must set out with sufficient certainty the nature and character of the offense charged-
Summary
Indictment for Selling Intoxicating Liquor Illegally The indictment was as follows: “ November Term, 1902. “ New Castle County, ss. “ The Grand Inquest for the State of Delaware, and the body of New Castle County, on their oath and affirmation, respectively, do present, that John Solio, late of Wilmington Hundred, in the County aforesaid, on the first day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and two, with force and arms at Christiana Hundred in the County aforesaid, at a certain place there situate to wit: at the place known as Montchanin Station, in the Hundred and County last aforesaid and at which said place the-business of selling intoxicating liquors was then and there carried on; he the said John Solio, did then and there unlawfully sell intoxicating liquor to wit, unlawfully to one John Mackinnon against the form of the Act of the General Assembly, in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. “Herbert H. Ward, “Attorney- General, “Robert H. Richards, “Deputy Attorney-General.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Lore

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Lore, C. J.:

—The Court are unanimously of opinion that this indictment should be quashed, because it does not set out with sufficient certainty the nature and character of the offense charged.

Indictment quashed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 11925: 119122026peak 1912 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Witsil129 A. 862 (1925)
  2. State v. Oleksy84 A. 7 (1912)

Most recent

  1. State v. Witsil129 A. 862 (1925)
  2. State v. Oleksy84 A. 7 (1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list