TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Matthew v. Fleetwood

Granville Matthew v. Thomas W. Fleetwood

Matthew v. Fleetwood, 82 A. 537 (Del. Super. Ct. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Delaware · State Trial Courts
Decided
February 12, 1912
Docket
No. 4
Judges
Boyce
Citations
82 A. 53726 Del. 1543 Boyce 1541912 Del. LEXIS 12
Syllabus
Appearance—Waiver of Objections—Summons—Defective Issuance—■ Waiver. In assumpsit on a book account, defendant, by appearing and not objecting to the issuance of summons without the affidavit required by statute, waived the defect, and, having confessed judgment, released the error committed in issuing the summons.
Summary
Certiorari directed to a justice of the peace to send up a transcript of his record in an action before him by Granville Matthew against Thomas W. Fleetwood, wherein judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant brings exceptions which were overruled. The exceptions relied upon for the reversal of the judgment were: (1) for that it does not appear from said record that the justice was satisfied by the oath of the plaintiff before issuing the summons returnable forthwith that there was danger of losing the benefit of said process by delay; (2) for that the record does not show the jurisdiction of the justice in such case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Boyce

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Boyce, J.:

It appears from the record that the action was in assumpsit on a book account of sixteen dollars and fifty-eight cents demanded; that summons issued January 5, 1911, returnable forthwith; that there was personal service; that the defendant personally appeared on the same day and confessed judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendant appearing and not objecting to the issuance of the summons without the affidavit, as required by the statute, he thereby waived the defect and having confessed judgment, released the error. Bishop v. Carpenter, 1 Houst. 526 ; Gum v. Adams, 9 Houst. 200 .

Judgment below affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteer169 A. 778 (Pa. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteer169 A. 778 (Pa. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list