Matthew v. Fleetwood
Granville Matthew v. Thomas W. Fleetwood
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Boyce, J.:
It appears from the record that the action was in assumpsit on a book account of sixteen dollars and fifty-eight cents demanded; that summons issued January 5, 1911, returnable forthwith; that there was personal service; that the defendant personally appeared on the same day and confessed judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
The defendant appearing and not objecting to the issuance of the summons without the affidavit, as required by the statute, he thereby waived the defect and having confessed judgment, released the error. Bishop v. Carpenter, 1 Houst. 526 ; Gum v. Adams, 9 Houst. 200 .
Judgment below affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.