TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Company

Indus. Comm'n v. Md. Cas. Co., 176 P. 290 (Colo. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Colorado · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 3, 1918
Docket
No. 9289
Judges
Teller
Citations
176 P. 29065 Colo. 554
Disposition
Judgment affirmed, on the authority of No. 9288. Opinion by Teller, J.
Summary
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John A. Perry, Judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Teller

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Mr. Justice Teller.

This case involves the same questions as those which were determined in Industrial Commission et al. v. Maryland Casualty Co., No. *555 9288, recently decided, 176 Pac. 288 . For the reasons stated in the opinion in the last mentioned case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Decided June 3d, A. D., 1918. Rehearing denied December 2d, A. D. 1918.

Judgment affirmed.

Chief Justice Hill and Mr. Justice Scott dissent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Indus. Comm'n v. Md. Cas. Co., 176 P. 288 (Colo. 1918) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list