TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Stade

State v. Stade, 1 D. Chip. 303 (1814)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Vermont · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1814
Citations
1 D. Chip. 303
Headnotes
The statute laws of any one of the United States, if printed under the authority of such State, may be read in evidence in t he Courts of this State.
Summary
THIS was an indictment for passing a counterfeit bank bill of the Bank of Troy. On trial, to prove that the Bank of Troy was - established by and under the authoritj' of the Legislature of the State of New-York, Baylies, State’s Attorney, offered to read in evidence to the Jury, ah act from a printed volume of the laws of that State, published by the authority of the Legislature, which contained the act, offered to be read, incorporating the Bank of Troy, declared to be a publick act. objected to the evidence offered. He contended that although the printed statutes of any State might be admitted in the Courts of such State, yet they could not be so admitted in the Courts of this State; but it is necessary , that such act be proved by a certificate under the seal of the State where it was passed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

The laws of the other States, printed under authority, have been constantly admitted in the Courts of this State, and such has been the practice of some, at least, of the neighbouring States. If such act be proved, agreeably to the provisions of the act of Congress, the Courts are bound to admit it — -they may admit it, although not so proved. Let the act be read from the printed book. *

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1826–1827: 11840–1841: 11846–1847: 11850–1851: 11902–1903: 118262026peak 1826 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Morrisette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.52 A. 520 (Vt. 1902)
  2. Brown v. Edson23 Vt. 435 (1851)
  3. Elliott v. Ray2 Blackf. 31 (1826)
  4. Territt v. Woodruff19 Vt. 182 (1847)
  5. Kinney v. Hosea3 Del. 77 (Del. Super. Ct. 1840)

Most recent

  1. Morrisette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.52 A. 520 (Vt. 1902)
  2. Brown v. Edson23 Vt. 435 (1851)
  3. Territt v. Woodruff19 Vt. 182 (1847)
  4. Kinney v. Hosea3 Del. 77 (Del. Super. Ct. 1840)
  5. Elliott v. Ray2 Blackf. 31 (1826)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list