TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hinkler v. Estate of Minkler

Hinkler v. The Estate of Minkler

Hinkler v. Estate of Minkler, 14 Vt. 558 (1842)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Vermont · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1842
Citations
14 Vt. 558
Headnotes
Where a ease comes to this court on exceptions to the decision of the county court of questions of law, this court cannot entertain a motion for a new trial on the ground of new-discovered evidence.
Summary
This case came into this court on exceptions to the decision of the county court of questions of law arising upon the trial of an issue of fact in that suit without the intervention of a jury. The party, taking exceptions in the court below, now files his motion in this court for a new trial, on the ground of having discovered new and material evidence since the trial of the cause.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

We cannot entertain that motion. In hearing this case we sit merely as a court of error, to revise the decision of the county court upon such questions of law as are reserved and sent here for revision. It is true that we *559 have power to grant new trials in causes tried in the county court, but only upon petition. Motions for new trials are addressed always to the discretion of the court which tried the case, and can only be entertained while the cause is pending in that court. Such is the only reasonable construction which could be put upon the first section of the thirty-third chapter of the Revised Statutes.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1844–1845: 11920–1921: 118442026peak 1844 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lowry v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.126 N.E. 223 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920)
  2. Blodgett v. Town of Royalton16 Vt. 497 (1844)

Most recent

  1. Lowry v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.126 N.E. 223 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920)
  2. Blodgett v. Town of Royalton16 Vt. 497 (1844)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list