TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Aldrich's Will

In Re Leonard F. Aldrich's Will

In re Aldrich's Will, 70 A. 566 (Vt. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Vermont · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 27, 1908
Judges
Munson, Rowell, Tyler, Watson
Citations
70 A. 56681 Vt. 3081908 Vt. LEXIS 148
Headnotes
Equity — Wills—Construction—Necessary Parties — Beneficiaries of Trust Estate — Municipal Corporations and Inhabitants Thereof Distinguished. Where a wiil made the inhabitants of certain municipalities beneficiaries of a trust estate, those beneficiaries are necessary parties to a bill in equity to construe the will, although the municipal corporations accepted service and appeared by their solicitor; since such corporations are not the same as their respective inhabitants, and do not bear the same relation to the will.
Summary
Appeal in Chancery. Heard at the March Term, 1908, Washington County, Hall, Chancellor. Bill dismissed. The orator appealed. This is a bill for the construction of the will of Leonard A. Aldrich, brought by the Aldrich Public Library, a corporation organized under No. 207, Acts 1898, as trustee under said will of certain property thereby given in trust for the purchase of a lot in the city of Barre and the erection and.maintenance thereon of a suitable building “to be occupied and used for a public library for the inhabitants within the limits of” the city of Barre and the town of Barre. The other pertinent facts are stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Watson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Watson, J.

By the will the inhabitants of both the city of Barre and the town of Barre constitute the cestuis que trust of the trust estate of which the orator is trustee, but they are not made parties to the bill and are not before the court. No one was in form made defendant, although the city and town respectively accepted service of the bill, and have appeared by their solicitor. Yet these corporations are not the same as the inhabitants thereof and do not bear the same relation to the will. The cestuis que trust have the equitable and ultimate interest to be affected by a decree upon the question presented by the bill. Consequently they are necessary parties. Story Eq. PI. Sec. 207.

The decree will therefore be reversed pro forma and cause remanded that the orator may act as it may be advised.

Decree reversed pro forma and cause remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list