Horton v. Peacock
HORTON AND REEL v. PEACOCK
Horton v. Peacock, 1 Wyo. 39 (1871)
Headnotes
Proceedincs in Error — Practice.—In commencing proceedings in error the provisions of the statutes must be strictly complied with. Thus, where the statutes require absolutely that a bond or undertaking for suits, etc., be given by plaintiff in error, and he fails so to do, his proceedings will, on motion, be dismissed.
Summary
Error to Laramie County, First Judicial District Court.
Judgment was entered in the district .court in favor of Amos Peacock, then plaintiff, now defendant in error, against Horton and Reel, now plaintiffs in error, and then defendants. In their proceedings in error, the said plaintiff failed to execute and file the bond required by statute, whereupon the attorneys for the defendant in error moved to dismiss the proceedings in error, and to affirm the judgment of the district court for the reason stated.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Motion granted.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.