TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Anthony Grandison v. Sewall Smith, Warden Theodore Purnell, Chief of Security Arnold Turner Alvin Wooden

Grandison v. Sewall Smith, Warden Theodore Purnell, Chief of Sec. Arnold Turner Alvin Wooden, 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 19, 1994
Docket
No. 94-6128
Citations
25 F.3d 10391994 WL 2010021994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20906

Opinion

25 F.3d 1039 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony GRANDISON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Sewall SMITH, Warden; Theodore Purnell, Chief of Security; Arnold Turner; Alvin Wooden, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994. Decided: May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-494-B)

Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grandison v. Smith, CA-93-494-B (D. Md. Dec. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list