TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Magnotti v. O'Brasky

Louise Magnotti v. Elizabeth O'Brasky

Magnotti v. O'Brasky, 268 A.2d 374 (Conn. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 5, 1970
Citations
268 A.2d 374159 Conn. 607

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The sole issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the motion by the plaintiff to set aside the verdict as inadequate. The plaintiff’s claims of injury and damages were strongly contested. It was the function of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the verdict returned was not reasonably reached upon a proper consideration of all the evidence.

There is no error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Birgel v. Heintz301 A.2d 249 (Conn. 1972)

Most recent

  1. Birgel v. Heintz301 A.2d 249 (Conn. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list