TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Green v. Anderson

Deshawn Green, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Situated v. Eloise Anderson, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Director, California Department of Social Services California Department of Social Services and Thomas Hayes, Director, California Department of Finance

Green v. Anderson, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: vacated, Anderson v. Green, 513 U.S. 557 (1995). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 13, 1994
Docket
No. 93-15306
Citations
26 F.3d 95

Opinion

26 F.3d 95

Deshawn GREEN, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on behalf of themselves and all others situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Eloise ANDERSON, individually and in her official capacity as Director, California Department of Social Services; California Department of Social Services; and Thomas Hayes, Director, California Department of Finance, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 93-15306.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994. Decided April 29, 1994. Amended June 13, 1994.

Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants.

Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER 1

We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case.

2

This Court's Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words "the preliminary injunction" between "AFFIRM" and "for."

3

The April 29, 1994 Order is redesignated ORDER FOR PUBLICATION.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1996: 11999: 119962026peak 1996 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Saenz v. Roe526 U.S. 489 (1999)
  2. Brown v. Wing170 Misc. 2d 554 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Saenz v. Roe526 U.S. 489 (1999)
  2. Brown v. Wing170 Misc. 2d 554 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Green v. Anderson, 811 F. Supp. 516 (E.D. Cal. 1993) 15
Green v. Anderson, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list