TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Taylor v. Williams

Taylor v. Williams, 14 Wis. 155 (1861)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 21, 1861
Judges
Cole
Citations
14 Wis. 155
Headnotes
J&.n application to this court, hy a defendant in error against whom a judgment ' for costshadheenrenderedhere, to have such judgment set off against a larger judgment in his favor obtained against the plaintiff in error in the circuit court, was granted under the circumstances of this case. The circumstances under which an application to set off one judgment against another is usually allowed, considered^1 Cora, .J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cole

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court, Cole, J.

This is an application on the part of Williams, the defendant in error, to have a judgment for costs in this court against him set off against a larger judgment in his favor obtained against Taylor in the circuit court. The application is made upon motion and proper notice to the opposite party.

From the authorities cited in support of the motion, it would seem to be the practice in England to set off one judgment against another even when they are in different courts. Hall vs. Ody, 2 Bos. & Pul., 29; Bridges vs. Smyth, 8 Bing., 29; Bristowe vs. Needham, 7 M. & G., 648. In this country the practice is not uniform. In New York such set-offs are allowed (1 Bur. Prac., 281; Ross vs. Hicks, 11 Barb. (S. C.), 481, and cases there cited); while in Kentucky the practice is disapproved. Tenant's heirs vs. Marmaduke, 5 B. Mon., 76 . But even where the practice to set off one judgment against another obtains, such set-off is only allowed when parties are interested in the respective judgments in the same right, and the judgment is conclusive, and the rights of the parties are not doubtful, complicated or intricate, and the application is made in the court where the judgment against the moving party was recovered. Ross vs. Hicks, supra. Upon such conditions and qualifications, the practice may not be open to serious objection. Of course such an application is always addressed to the sound discretion of the court in which it is made, and we should not entertain one where the equities of the case were not clear, or where we should have to enter npon any extended examination to determine the facts of the case, or the rights of the parties. This motion to make the set-off is not serionsly resisted, although the counsel for Taylor suggested that it would *156 be more correct to mate the application in the circuit court where the larger judgment existed. We suppose the de-J fendant in error could only make the motion here where thel judgment was against him, and applying to have the set-off made he will be bound by the order of this court, and musí see to it that the judgment of the circuit court is pro tanto discharged.

The motion is granted, but without costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1876–1877: 11882–1883: 11884–1885: 11900–1901: 118762026peak 1876 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Welsher v. Libby82 N.W. 693 (Wis. 1900)
  2. Yorton v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.21 N.W. 516 (Wis. 1885)
  3. Herman v. Miller17 Kan. 328 (1876)
  4. Brookfield v. Hughson44 N.J.L. 285 (1882)

Most recent

  1. Welsher v. Libby82 N.W. 693 (Wis. 1900)
  2. Yorton v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.21 N.W. 516 (Wis. 1885)
  3. Brookfield v. Hughson44 N.J.L. 285 (1882)
  4. Herman v. Miller17 Kan. 328 (1876)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Tenant's heirs v. Marmaduke, 44 Ky. 76 (1844) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list