TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Perry

In the Matter of the Petition of Charles A. Perry for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

In re Perry, 19 Wis. 676 (1865)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1865
Judges
Downer
Citations
19 Wis. 676
Headnotes
Since the abolition of capital punishment in this state, persons charged with murder are in all eases bailable.
Summary
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner was imprisoned in the common jail of Wal worth county, under a commitment from a justice of the peace for said county, dated June 27th, 1865, which stated in the usual form that he had been charged with the crime of murder committed upon one Shay, and that there was reasonable cause to believe him guilty, &c. The county judge of said county refused an application of the prisoner to he admitted to bail, on the ground that his right to bail was doubtful. The constitution of this state, sec. 8, Art. I, provides that “ All persons shall before conviction be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great.” By ch. 103, Laws of 1853, capital punishment is abolished in this state. contended that offenses which were punishable with death at the time of the adoption of the constitution of this state, are not rendered bailable by the abolition of that form of punishment, citing Wilson v. The State, 1 Wis., 184, and arguing that this principle of interpretation is followed in those cases where this court has held that the constitutional privilege of a trial by jury secures the right to a common law jury of twelve men.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Downer

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court, Downer, J.

The court are of opinion that since the abolition of capital punishment in this state, persons charged with murder are in all cases bailable.

The motion is granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1889: 11910: 11920: 11967: 11972: 11975: 12018: 218892026peak 2018 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Flood269 So. 2d 212 (La. 1972)
  2. People ex rel. Hemingway v. Elrod322 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. 1975)
  3. Ex parte Heath126 S.W. 1031 (Mo. 1910)
  4. In re Ball188 P. 424 (Kan. 1920)
  5. Ex parte Walker13 S.W. 861 (Tex. App. 1889)
  6. State ex rel. Campbell v. Wood155 S.E.2d 893 (W. Va. 1967)

Most recent

  1. State v. Ameer458 P.3d 390 (N.M. 2018)
  2. State v. Ameer2018 NMSC 30
  3. People ex rel. Hemingway v. Elrod322 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. 1975)
  4. State v. Flood269 So. 2d 212 (La. 1972)
  5. State ex rel. Campbell v. Wood155 S.E.2d 893 (W. Va. 1967)
  6. In re Ball188 P. 424 (Kan. 1920)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list