Morse v. Spees
Morse v. Spees and another
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Dixon, C. J..
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a common-law writ of certiorari, from the judgment of the circuit court dismissing the writ. The writ was to a justice of the peace, to bring up the record, etc., in a certain action tried before him, in which judgment had been rendered against the plaintiff in error, and in favor of the defendants in error. It was regularly allowed, sued out, served and returned. The circuit court, having heard the cause, dismissed the writ, and gave judgment against the plaintiff in error for costs. The question is upon the regularity of this judgment. We think it was irregular. Judgment of dismissal is only proper for *544 defects in tlie writ, or the service, or for want of jurisdiction. But here there were no such defects, and the court had jurisdiction. The judgment of the circuit court should have been one of affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the justice. On appéal from such a judgment, the regularity of the proceedings before the justice, so far as they were capable of being inquired into, on the writ, could be reviewed by this court; but upon this appeal there can be no such review. We can only inquire as to the cause of dismissal, and it appearing that there was no good cause, the judgment must be reversed, however well "we may be satisfied that the errors complained of in the proceedings before the justice were not such as could be remedied by the writ. The plaintiff in error was entitled to judgment in such form that he could take the opinion of this court upon that question.
By the Qomt. —The judgment is reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.