Loucheine v. Strouse
Loucheine v. Strouse and another
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ryan, 0. J.
This motion is denied on the merits. The affidavit presented for the appellants has satisfied the court that the appeal, though not prosecuted, was taken in good faith. In such a case the court will not award extra damages or costs. N. W. M. L. Ins. Co. v. Irish, 38 Wis., 361 .
But the motion has suggested to the court the necessity of providing against the dismissal, by appellants ex parte, of appeals taken in bad faith, so as to evade the statute providing for extra damages and costs upon affirmance.
And hereafter appellants will not be allowed to dismiss their appeals, except by consent or upon notice to the respondents.
By the Court. — Motion denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.