Sloteman v. Mack
Sloteman and another v. Mack, imp.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
LyoN, J.
This is an appeal from an order striking out certain portions of appellant’s answer. The action is upon a contract for putting a steam-heating and ventilating apparatus in the building of the appellant, one of the defendants. The answer consists of matter pleaded as a defense to the action, and two counterclaims. The portions stricken'out are in the defensive portion of the answer. It is unnecessary to make any more specific statement of the pleadings,” or to determine whether the matter stricken out should have been retained. If it was error to strike out those portions, it is one which does not harm the appellant or affect any substantial right. Under the answer, as it now stands, the appellant may introduce any evidence that he could have introduced under the original answer. Hence the error (if error it be) does not work a reversal of the order. R. S. sec. 2829.
By the Court.— The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.