TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Exparte Cox

Exparte Cox, 10 Mo. 742 (1847)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 15, 1847
Judges
Napton
Citations
10 Mo. 742
Headnotes
3. A change of Venue cannot be awarded after the issues in a case have been tried and a verdict found. 2. If, in such case, a change of venue be awarded, a mandamus will lie from the Supreme Court to compel the Circuit Court granting the change to proceed and determine the cause.
Summary
APPLICATION for a Mandamus to Platte Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Napton

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Napton, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

It appears from the petition of Adeline Cox, and the record accompanying it, that a suit was instituted by Jacob Cox against the petitioner, who was his wife, for a divorce — that bill and answer were filed — issues made up and tried by a jury — and a verdict found. At this stage of the proceedings, Jacob Cox applied for a change of venue, on the ground that the Judge of the Platte Circuit Court was prejudiced against him. The change was ordered, and this application is to compel the said Circuit Court to proceed and determine the cause.

Our statute which authorizes a change of venue in civil cases, does not in terms declare at what period of the cause such orders may be made. There can b'e no doubt, however, that it never was contemplated that the progress of a suit could be interrupted at any period by such applications. The law must be construed with reference to the practice *743 of other courts and our courts, so as not to produce inconvenience and absurdity. We need not, in this case, undertake to fix any particular period, beyond which such applications should be disregarded, but we do not hesitate to say that, after the issues have been made up and tried, it is too late for the complainant to come in and swear that the Judge is prejudiced. No special facts are stated to account for this untimely application. If any prejudice existed on the part of the Judge, it must have existed before the suit was tried. Is a party to lie by until near the close of a trial, and when the developements elicited in its progress have induced a belief that the result will be unfavorable, to be then permitted to abandon the tribunal he has himself selected, and try the chances of some other jurisdiction ? Such a course would tend to endless litigation. We will not presume that such a proceeding was designed to be tolerated, unless the Legislature shall expressly say so. We think the Circuit Court of Platte county erred in granting the application of Jacob Cox, and shall therefore award the mandamus asked for.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1875–1876: 11881–1882: 11905–1906: 11955–1956: 11975–1976: 11985–1986: 22017–2018: 118752026peak 1985 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jenkins v. Andrews526 S.W.2d 369 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975)
  2. State ex rel. Carleton v. District Court82 P. 789 (Mont. 1905) · Dissent
  3. Savings Finance Corporation v. Blair280 S.W.2d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 1955)
  4. City of Kansas City v. Wiley697 S.W.2d 240 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
  5. Woodrow v. Younger61 Mo. 395 (1875)
  6. Martin v. State526 S.W.3d 169 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Most recent

  1. Martin v. State526 S.W.3d 169 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
  2. State ex rel. Oliver v. Bradley699 S.W.2d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
  3. City of Kansas City v. Wiley697 S.W.2d 240 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
  4. Jenkins v. Andrews526 S.W.2d 369 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975)
  5. Savings Finance Corporation v. Blair280 S.W.2d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 1955)
  6. State ex rel. Carleton v. District Court82 P. 789 (Mont. 1905) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list