TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morrow v. State

Morrow v. State, 12 Mo. 279 (1848)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1848
Judges
McBride
Citations
12 Mo. 279
Summary
APPEAL FROM ST. LOUIS CRIMINAL COURT. We contend that it is undeniably true that this case is in every essential point like the case of Jacob Hawthorne vs. the State, and the opinion of the court in that case is a true and clear exposition of the law, fully sustained upon general principles, and the case of the State of Delaware vs. Phalen & Pain 3d Harrington R. 452. By the act of the 26th day of February, 1835, all the powers to contract for the drawing of this lottery, that belonged to the Hospital Lottery was conferred upon it, and up to the time of the law of 19th Dee., 1842, repealing all laws authorizing the drawing of any lottery, there was-a vested right by contract in Gregory which that act could not impair.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — McBride

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McBride judge

delivered the opinion of the court.

*280 This case is similar to the case of the State vs. Jacob Hawthorn, decided by this court, and reported in the 9 Mo. R. 389. The judgment will be reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1872–1873: 11876–1877: 218722026peak 1876 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Miller50 Mo. 129 (1872)
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Miller66 Mo. 328 (1877)
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Miller1 Mo. App. 48 (1876) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Miller66 Mo. 328 (1877)
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Miller1 Mo. App. 48 (1876) · Dissent
  3. State v. Miller50 Mo. 129 (1872)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list