Ray v. Fitch
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court.
The writ of error is insufficient.
The statute is — “ That the Superior and County Courts, shall and may from time to time, as occasion shall require, and as shall by them be judged reasonable and proper; grant new trials of causes, that shall come before them, for mis-pleading, or discovery of new evidence, or for other reasonable cause appearing, according to the common and usual rules and methods in such cases.” The power given to the courts by the statute, granting new trials, in the causes which come before them, for the reasons therein enumerated, is a discretionary power, and it has been determined, that a writ of error doth not lie against a judgment of a court, merely for granting a hew trial. Kimball v. Cady, Kirby, 26. And a writ of error will not lie against any interlocutory judgment, before final judgment is given. See Carpenter v. Childs, determined at Windham, March Term, 1790.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.