Mister v. Corrigan
James F. Mister, Administrator of John Dowling v. Thomas Corrigan
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion by Ellison, J.
When this cause was submitted, by agreement of the parties and consent of the court, the appellant was given ten days in which to file his brief and statement.
Though the ten days have long since expired, there is as yet no brief or statement in behalf of appellant. It is likewise discovered, on examination, there is no assign *511 ment oí errors. The law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by agreement. — Dike v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551 ; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418 . The judgment below is affirmed.
The other judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.