TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Gilmore

State of Missouri v. Michael Gilmore

State v. Gilmore, 28 Mo. App. 561 (1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 11, 1888
Judges
Ellison
Citations
28 Mo. App. 5611888 Mo. App. LEXIS 27
Disposition
Transferred to Supreme Court.
Headnotes
Practice — Criminal Law — Indictment Under Section 1547, Revised Statutes — Whence Appealable Upon Conviction. — In the case of an indictment under section 1547, Revised Statutes, as amended by Laws, 1881, page 112, commonly known as the “Johnson Gambling Law,” and conviction thereunder, and sentence to imprisonment in the county jail, the conviction is for felony, under section 1676, Revised Statutes, and this court has no jurisdiction, under section 12, article 6, of the constitution of this state. The appeal, in such a case, is to the Supreme Court, and this cause must be transferred to that court.
Summary
Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court, Hon. Henry P. White, Judge. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ellison

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ellison, J.

Defendant was indicted at the November term, 1886, of the Jackson criminal court, under section 1547, Revised Statutes, as amended by Acts, 1881, page 112, commonly known as the “ Johnson Gambling Law.” He was convicted and his punishment assessed at six months in the county jail, from which he appeals to this court. It is declared by the section referred to, that whoever shall “be convicted of any of the offences therein named, shall be adjudged guilty of a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not less than two nor more than five years; or by imprisonment in the county jail for a term not less than six nor more than twelve months.” Our statutory definition of a felony is “any offence for which the offender, on con *562 viction, shall be liable by law, to be punished with death or imprisonment in the penitentiary.” Rev. Stat., sec. 1676. A misdemeanor by the same statute (sec. 1678) includes offences “punishable only by fine or imprisonment in the county jail, or both.” From these sections, 1676 and 1678, it is evident that the defendant has been convicted of a felony, for the reason that the offence was one for which he was “liable” to be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary. The fact that he was, in this case, actually punished by imprisonment in the county jail does not alter the matter; he was liable to a punishment of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and the punishment prescribed for his offence was not fine or imprisonment in the county jail “ only.” But aside from these sections, the statute defining the offence declares its commission to be a felony without regard to the punishment which may be inflicted.

There is no doubt of the want of jurisdiction in this court, under section 12, article 6, of the constitution, and we, therefore, order the cause transferred to the Supreme Court of the state.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1893: 21897: 11909: 11910: 11914: 11956: 118932026peak 1893 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Melton23 S.W. 889 (Mo. 1893)
  2. State v. Zinn42 S.W. 938 (Mo. 1897)
  3. State ex rel. Sanks v. Johnson121 S.W. 780 (Mo. Ct. App. 1909)
  4. State v. Wilson126 S.W. 996 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)
  5. State v. Melton53 Mo. App. 646 (1893)
  6. State v. Sparks166 S.W. 642 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)

Most recent

  1. State v. Dikos294 S.W.2d 41 (Mo. 1956)
  2. State v. Sparks166 S.W. 642 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)
  3. State v. Wilson126 S.W. 996 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)
  4. State ex rel. Sanks v. Johnson121 S.W. 780 (Mo. Ct. App. 1909)
  5. State v. Zinn42 S.W. 938 (Mo. 1897)
  6. State v. Melton23 S.W. 889 (Mo. 1893)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list