Ecton v. Kansas City, Osceola & Southern Railway Co.
A. D. Ecton v. Kansas City, Osceola & Southern Railway Company
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Gill, J.
— The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the lower court, quashing an execution issued on a judgment, by him obtained, against the defendant. The cause originated in a justice’s court, where the defendant filed its motion to quash the execution. The motion was overruled by the justice, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. On a hearing there, the court sustained the motion, and plaintiff is the appellant here.
We are unable to review the action of the circuit court, as to its ruling on the motion, for the reason that the plaintiff saved no exceptions at the time of such ruling. This course we are compelled to pursue, under repeated decisions, in this state. As said in Bateson v. *338 Clark, 37 Mo. 34 , this was a matter of mere exception, which arose from the action of the court during the progress of the trial, and is “strictly no part of the record, unless made so by being incorporated in a bill of exceptions, and, to entitle it to any notice, or be made available here, the action of the court must have been excepted to at the time the alleged error was committed. See, also, Corby v. Tracy, 62 Mo. 511 .
The judgment must be affirmed;
All concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.