TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Walton v. Martin

Timothy Dexter Walton v. William W. Martin Bobby Renick Harry Clingenpeel Alex Barrett W. Q. Overton Vicki Meadors, and Rocky Mount Town Council Rocky Mount Town Administrator

Walton v. Martin, 28 F.3d 1212 (4th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 8, 1994
Docket
No. 94-6192
Citations
28 F.3d 12121994 WL 3260141994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24786
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

28 F.3d 1212

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Timothy Dexter WALTON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. William W. MARTIN; Bobby Renick; Harry Clingenpeel; Alex Barrett; W. Q. Overton; Vicki Meadors, Defendants Appellees, and ROCKY MOUNT TOWN COUNCIL; Rocky Mount Town Administrator, Defendants.

No. 94-6192.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 14, 1994. Decided July 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-539-R)

Timothy Dexter Walton, appellant pro se.

William Fain Rutherford, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Randy Virlin Cargill, Woods, Rogers & Hazelgrove, Roanoke, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walton v. Martin, No. CA-92-539-R (W.D.Va. June 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list