TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States

NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., and NTN Corp. v. United States, U.S. Department of Commerce, and Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce, and Timken Co., defendant-intervenor

NTN Bearing Corp. of Am. v. United States, 888 F. Supp. 1210 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Court of International Trade · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
June 7, 1995
Docket
Nos. Court Nos. 92-03-00168 and 92-04-00257
Judges
Tsoualas
Citations
888 F. Supp. 121019 Ct. Int'l Trade 82419 C.I.T. 82417 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 17931995 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 163

Opinion of the Court — Tsoualas

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

JUDGMENT tsoualas, Judge:

On December 29, 1994, this Court, in Slip Op. 94-200, remanded to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”), the final results of its third administrative review of certain tapered roller bearings, finished and unfinished, and parts thereof (“TRBs”) from Japan, produced by NTN Bearing Corporation, and distributed by its subsidiary, NTN Bearing Corporation of America (collectively, “NTN”). NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp. and NTN Corp. v. United States, 18 CIT 1178 , Slip Op. 94-200 (December 29, 1994). These final results covered the period October 1,1989 through September 30,1990. Subsequently, on January 3, 1995, this Court issued Slip Op. 95-1, remanding to Commerce the amended determination for the same review. NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp. and NTN Corp. v. United States, 19 CIT _ , Slip Op. 95-1 (January 3, 1995). Both orders directed Commerce (1) to impose a 10% limit upon the deviation factors in the five-criterion model-match methodology used in the final results for selecting the most similar home market TRB model; (2) to explain its reasons for not accepting NTN’s compensating deposits; (3) to reconcile a discrepancy between the analysis *825 memorandum and the computer programming language, and correct any potential error; and (4) to correct an acknowledged programming error.

On March 14, 1995, Commerce released draft remand results and invited the parties to comment on those results. None of the parties submitted comments regarding the draft remand results. On March 29, 1995, Commerce filed the final results with this Court. Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corporation and NTN Corporation v. United States, Slip Op, 94-200 (December 29, 1994) and Slip Op. 95-1 (January 3, 1995).

Commerce has complied with the instruction of this Court and this Court is satisfied with the explanations given by Commerce for their actions. The Court has considered all comments submitted by the parties and found their arguments to be without merit. Therefore, the final results of redetermination pursuant to this Court’s remand are affirmed in all respects and these actions are dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1996: 319962026peak 1996 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States91 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
  2. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1120 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)
  3. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1121 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

Most recent

  1. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1121 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)
  2. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1120 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)
  3. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States91 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list