Apollinaris Brunnen v. Somborn
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
WHEELER, District Judge.
Upon the hearing of the motion of the orator for a preliminary injunction in this cause, it is considered, that the use, by the defendants, on their labels and bottles, of the word “Apol-linis,” in connection with the representation of a bow and arrow, or anchor, as used by them, on account of the similarity between them and the word “Apollinaris” and the representation of an anchor, as before used by the orator, is calculated to lead those using and dealing in such waters, to suppose that the waters of the defendants, so marked, are the waters of the orator; and, as there is no other reason apparent, that the use of these .symbols was adopted for that purpose. Wherefore, it is ordered, that, upon the filing a bond to the defendants, in such penal sum ns shall be fixed by the clerk, as a master of this court, with good surety approved by him, conditioned for the payment of all damages to the defendants, in case it shall finally be determined, in this cause, that the orator is not entitled to this injunction, a writ of injunction do issue, to restrain the defendants from the further use of the word “Apollinis,” and such representation of an anchor, or bow and arrow, in connection with the sale •of their waters, until further order in the premises.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.