Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. James
The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., in error v. Robert James, in error
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. James, 41 N.W. 993 (Neb. 1889)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Maxwell, J.
The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the case of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. James, just decided, and the same judgment will be entered.
The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
The other Judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.