TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McDonald v. Grabow

Mary McDonald v. John Grabow

McDonald v. Grabow, 64 N.W. 1093 (Neb. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 19, 1895
Docket
No. 5765
Judges
Norval
Citations
64 N.W. 109346 Neb. 4061895 Neb. LEXIS 498
Headnotes
Appeal: Transcript: Authentication. In order to effect an appeal from the district to the supreme court,.it is necessary to file with the clerk of this court, within the time prescribed by statute, a transcript of the proceedings, authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the district court. Such requirement is jurisdictional, and the stipulation of the parties or their attorneys stating that the transcript contains all the proceedings •will not supply the omission of the certificate of the clerk of the trial court. ■
Summary
Appeal from the district court of Sarpy county. Heard below before Scott, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Norval

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Norval, C. J.

The appeal in this case must be dismissed because no transcript of the proceedings, authenticated by the certificate .of the clerk of the district court, has ever been filed in this court. In the record is a stipulation signed by the parties to the effect that the transcript contains all the proceedings in the case, but this does not meet the requirements of the statute relating to appeals to the supreme court, Code, section 675, which declares: “The party appealing shall, within six months after the date of the rendition of the judgment or decree, or the making of the final order, procure from the clerk of the district court and file in the office of the clerk of the supreme court a certified transcript of the proceedings had in the cause in the district court, containing the pleadings, the judgment, or decree,” etc. The stipulation of the parties does not take the place of the certificate of the clerk of the district court. The requirement of the statute, regarding the authentication of the transcript by the clerk of the district court, is mandatory. {Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb., 498 , and cases there cited.) For the reason stated, the appeal cannot be entertained and it is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1895: 11896: 11897: 31898: 21899: 11920: 11939: 118952026peak 1897 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dobesh v. Associated Asphalt Contractors, Inc.288 N.W. 32 (Neb. 1939)
  2. State ex rel. Ayres v. Amsberry177 N.W. 179 (Neb. 1920)
  3. Otis v. Butters64 N.W. 1093 (Neb. 1895)
  4. P. Brockman Commission Co. v. Sang72 N.W. 856 (Neb. 1897)
  5. Einspahr v. Exchange National Bank68 N.W. 933 (Neb. 1896)
  6. Bailey v. Eastman74 N.W. 959 (Neb. 1898)

Most recent

  1. Dobesh v. Associated Asphalt Contractors, Inc.288 N.W. 32 (Neb. 1939)
  2. State ex rel. Ayres v. Amsberry177 N.W. 179 (Neb. 1920)
  3. Bohman v. Chase79 N.W. 707 (Neb. 1899)
  4. Bailey v. Eastman74 N.W. 959 (Neb. 1898)
  5. Forbes v. Morearty74 N.W. 822 (Neb. 1898)
  6. P. Brockman Commission Co. v. Sang72 N.W. 856 (Neb. 1897)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Moore v. Waterman, 58 N.W. 940 (Neb. 1894) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list