Otis v. Butters
Luke S. Otis v. Zeri M. Butters
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Norval, C. J.
Each assignment in the petition in error, as well as every proposition discussed in the brief, is predicated upon matters disclosed solely by the supplemental transcript filed by the plaintiff in error in this court on July 9, 1894, and which alone contains the purported judgment sought to be reviewed. This transcript cannot be recognized by us, inasmuch as it is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the court below, as by statute required. Following Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb., 498 , and McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Neb., 406 , decided herewith, the petition in error is dismissed.
Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.