Douglas County v. Keller
Douglas County v. Charles B. Keller
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Norval, J.
This is tbe second appearance of this case in this-court, tbe opinion affirming tbe judgment of tbe court below being reported in 43 Neb., 635 . After tbe issuance of tbe mandate and tbe filing thereof in tbe district court, tbe county filed a motion to set aside and vacate tbe judgment upon various grounds, among others, that tbe court bad no jurisdiction of tbe subject-matter of tbe action, which motion was subsequently overruled, and tbe county prosecutes error therefrom.
*318 Precisely the same questions argued and presented herein were involved in the case of Stenberg v. State, 48 Neb., 299 , decided herewith, and following the decision therein, the judgment is
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.