Staples v. Arlington State Bank
Edward T. Staples v. Arlington State Bank
Staples v. Arlington State Bank, 74 N.W. 1066 (Neb. 1898)
Headnotes
Continuance: Exception to Ruling: Review. To review an order denying a continuance it is necessary to take an exception to 'the ruling in the trial court.
Summary
Error from the district court of Washington county. Tried below before Keysor, J.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Irvine, C.
The plaintiffs in error complain in their briefs of only-one ruling of the district court the overruling of an. application for a continuance. No exception was taken to the order complained of and it cannot, therefore, be reviewed. (Coad v. Home Cattle Co., 32 Neb. 761.)
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.