Melcher v. Haley
J. E. Melcher v. J. L. Haley
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Nor val, J.
Attached to the record is the certificate of the clerk of the district court stating “that the foregoing is the original bill of exceptions in said cause, and also a true and perfect transcript of the petition, answer, reply, instructions, verdict, motion for a new trial, and order of extension of time in said action, as the same are on file and of record in my office.” It wall be observed that the final judgment in the cause is not authenticated, and for this reason the proceeding in error must be dismissed. (Bailey v. Eastman, 54 Neb. 416 , and cases there cited; Geneva Nat. Bank v. Donovan, 53 Neb. 613 ; Union P. R. Co. v. Young, 52 Neb. 190 ; First Nat. Bank of Pierce v. Noble, 52 Neb. 507 .)
Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.