Dovey v. McCullough
Margaret E. Dovey v. Elizabeth McCullough
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Non val, C. J.
This is an error proceeding to review an order confirming the sale of real estate under a decree foreclosing a tax lien. The grounds urged in the court below for vacating the sale were: (1.) That an appeal had been prosecuted from the decree of foreclosure and a supersedeas bond given. (2.) The property was appraised too low. (3.) Lots 10 and 11 were appraised together. (4.) No copy of the appraisement was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court within the time required by law. The same points only are raised by the petition in error. The appeal from the decree of foreclosure did not stay the carrying into effect its provisions, as no supersedeas bond was given by the appellants within twenty days after the decree was rendered, as section 677 of the Code of Civil Procedure required.
No objection to the appraisement having been made before the sale, this court is not called upon to determine whether the premises were appraised too low, or whether each lot should have been separately appraised. A copy of the appraisement was deposited by the sheriff in the office of the clerk of the district court before the property was advertised for sale. This was all the law required. The order of confirmation is
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.