TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hawver v. Parkway Real Estate Co.

Harriet L. Hawver v. Parkway Real Estate Company

Hawver v. Parkway Real Estate Co., 87 N.W. 312 (Neb. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 18, 1901
Docket
No. 9,655
Judges
Norval, Sullivan, Voting
Citations
87 N.W. 31262 Neb. 5041901 Neb. LEXIS 230
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
1. Conflicting Evidence. A finding of fact based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on review, unless clearly erroneous. . Judicial Sale: Review. A ground for setting aside a judicial sale is unavailing- on review, unless tlie same was presented to the court below.
Summary
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard beloiv before Poavell, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Norval

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Norval, C. J.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the district court confirming the sale of real estate made under a decree foreclosing a mortgage.

The appraisement and sale are assailed on the ground that the property was appraised at such a low sum as to amount to a fraud. Evidence in the nature of affidavits was taken on this point, which has been preserved in a bill *505 of exceptions. This evidence, as might be expected, was exceedingly conflicting. That introduced on one side fully sustains the appraisement as made, while that produced by the defendants tends to show that the premises were appraised at a sum not to exceed one-half their fair market value. Conflicting evidence will not he reviewed on appeal.

It is finally insisted that the sale should he vacated for the reason the sheriff offered for sale real estate which was not embraced in, nor covered by, the decree. A sufficient answer to this contention is that the record before us does not show that the sheriff did this. Besides, the objection ivas not raised in the court below. Creighton University v. Riley, 50 Nebr., 341. The order is

Affirmed.

Sullivan, J., absent, not voting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list