Crewison v. Oelschlegal
Ernest Crewison v. Karl H. Oelschlegal
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Sedgwick, J.
The facts in this case are in all respects similar to those involved in the case of Garnett v. Meyers, 65 Neb. 287 , decided at this term.- In that case it was held that provisions in regard to the indebtedness itself which are inserted in a mortgage executed contemporaneously with the note, must be construed with the note, and if the contract, so construed, is not negotiable, the maker of the mortgage, without notice of any assignment thereof, may pay .the same to the original payee in the mortgage, and is thereupon entitled to a satisfaction of the mortgage.
*574 For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.