New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. Bendsen
New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Company v. Carrie M. Bendsen, Administratrix
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Oldham, C.
The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. Fred Anderson, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Hopper, Deceased, post, p. 84. The intestate in this case *50 met his death from the same cause and under the same conditions and surroundings as those occasioning the death of' Charles Hopper, his fellow workman; consequently, this case should follow the decision recently announced in that case.
Hence, for the reasons set forth in the above cited case, we recommend that the judgment of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded.
Barnes and Pound, CC., concur.
By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.