Hopper v. Douglas County
Daniel Hopper v. Douglas County
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Oldham, C.
This is a companion case to Hopper v. Douglas County, ante, p. 329. The two cases involved the same question, and by agreement were consolidated and argued together. Hence, for the reasons given in the opinion in said case, we think the trial court was correct in sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, and we recommend that the judgment be affirmed.
Ames and Letton, CC., concur.
By the Court: For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.