O'Donnell v. Heimann
John O'Donnell v. Bernard Heimann
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Barnes, J.
This was an action in ejectment to recover possession of an undivided one-fourth of the same tract of land which was in controversy in Kulp v. Heimann, ante, p. 167. The pleadings were similar to those in that case, with the exception of a plea of the statute of limitations, which was there interposed.- The evidence in both cases was practically the same. Defendants had the judgment, and the plaintiff has appealed.
Following, the decision in that case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.