State ex rel. Benson v. Mayor of Hastings
State, ex rel. James A. Benson v. Mayor and Council of the City of Hastings
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Pee Cueiam.
This cause was argued and submitted, and in due time a decision was rendered. The opinion is reported ante, p. 304. A motion and briefs for rehearing were filed, and, *853 upon further reflection and examination, some of the members of the court became doubtful of the correctness of the decision, and argument was ordered upon the motion for rehearing. When the cause was called for hearing, it was shown that the respondents had complied with the commands of the alternative writ of mandamus in all things and no rights could be protected or enforced by any further hearing.
The motion for rehearing is
OVEBBULED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.